Content sites
First find existing content worth improving.
Protect the distinct intent of existing pages. Whether content is complete matters more than writing another similar article.
Review my existing content Read-only Google connection · $9 / monthDecide whether to repair this page, keep it or create another
Write the existing page’s reader task first. Use page-query evidence and the actual answer, rather than a word-count target, to choose work.
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to read the verification column.
| What you observe | What to do | What to retain or verify |
|---|---|---|
| The page names the problem but gives no decision | Add a relevant branch, required evidence, executable steps and a way to check the result. | A reader should leave with a decision or a specific missing check, not another vague “optimize” instruction. |
| Another page covers a genuinely different task | Keep the distinct page and link at the point where the reader needs that next task. | Document the task difference; near-synonym titles alone do not justify new pages. |
Work through the distinction
Teaching example: “why Google selected another canonical” and “how to submit a sitemap” need different evidence and actions. One long article combining everything would make both harder to use.
First, see what you'll get.
This is an interactive sample. Actual results come from sites you authorize.
First decide whether to change, keep, or continue researching.
Improve existing pages
Add the conditions, evidence, and steps readers need.
Protect effective content
Avoid splitting the same task with near-synonym articles.
Continue research
Do not force new content for article count or keyword count.
Before using it, understand these details.
How it works, data boundaries, and applicable conditions.
First see what impressions existing articles get
Group existing queries into real reader tasks, then check whether the page directly answers the question.
High impressions and low clicks need review
This may involve ranking, result presentation, search intent, or query composition. Do not change titles just because CTR is low.
Give optimization enough observation time
After changes, record the date and action and keep a consistent observation window. Extend observation for low samples; do not promise results in a few days.
First build a content task map
Put existing article titles, URLs, and reader tasks in one list and merge duplicate intents. Query bubbles are only demand clues; return to the body and search results to verify whether a suitable answer already exists.
Substantive improvement, not expansion
Add direct answers, applicable conditions, steps, verifiable materials, and common mistakes. Adding irrelevant paragraphs, copying FAQs, or keyword stuffing does not prove value. Do not fabricate when the original case lacks evidence.
Protect existing effective pages
For pages with good ranking or clicks, check stability and semantic entry points first, and do not change URLs lightly. New content should serve a distinct task and complement existing pages, avoiding near-synonym pages competing with each other.
Determine whether changes are effective
Record actions and dates, and observe the same pages, market, queries, and complete window. Extend for low samples, and note seasonality and query changes; one increase is not reliable causal proof.
Frequently asked questions
Will it write articles automatically?
No. The current product provides analysis direction, not automatic writing or publishing.
Should I create a page for every keyword?
No. Prioritize improving existing pages for the same reader task.
Continue to the next step.
Start with your own site.
Verify the data and analysis first, then decide your next step.